Jump to content

JumpinJackJake Jails me based off assumption


Casual

Recommended Posts

Your in-game name: Casuals Dungeon

Staff members name: JumpinJackJake

Staff member SteamID(http://steamidfinder.com/)? Ex. STEAM_0:0:71487010STEAM_0:0:485161438

Explain what happened: I was rping and this user took my ammo, therefore that is considered stealing an entity of mine and I killed the user. I was not recording the event at the time that this took place. When I was brought to a sit that regarded the event that had just taken place he asked if I had evidence, I told him no as I had only begin recording once the sit had commenced. When I told the admin that I had no evidence he didnt bother to ask if the reporting party had evidence and just jailed me without any sort of proof that I had actually committed RDM, he just went off pure assumption, kind of leaning towards bias in this situtation.

Evidence (screenshots, video, chat log, etc. This is required!)

This event mentally scarred and made me scared of the staff team, please send help D;

During this jail time 5 of my lolis escaped the dungeon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JumpinJackJake said:

I jailed you cause you didn't have proof that he took your ammo, if you dont then we have to jail you for rdm. logs only show that you killed him. I need you to proof other wise, that is why i ask for proof

 

There's this thing called pickup logs. I'm 100% certain you have them. Your situational awareness could use some work.

+support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Exld said:

There's this thing called pickup logs.

these never worked before

 

4 hours ago, JumpinJackJake said:

I jailed you cause you didn't have proof that he took your ammo, if you dont then we have to jail you for rdm. logs only show that you killed him. I need you to proof other wise, that is why i ask for proof

you shouldn't jail him in this situation, you should've closed the sit since you don't have enough evidence to deal with in the first place

you clearly took the victim side which makes you bias

sorry but +support 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JumpinJackJake said:

I jailed you cause you didn't have proof that he took your ammo, if you dont then we have to jail you for rdm. logs only show that you killed him. I need you to proof other wise, that is why i ask for proof

 

Dear bruh,

I don't even play on DRP but you can't just bring someone and ask him to prove that he is innocent. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. You didn't have any evidence so you should have closed the case. You just took the victims side not knowing if he was right or wrong. That's kinda bias.

+SUPPORT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GhosTy said:

these never worked before

 

you shouldn't jail him in this situation, you should've closed the sit since you don't have enough evidence to deal with in the first place

you clearly took the victim side which makes you bias

sorry but +support 

Yeah man, I agree with what Ghosty said on this.
im sorry dude, +support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- support. without proof that he took your ammo then you have no proof that its not rdm. logs show that you killed him. there are no pick up logs. so given the info he has to deal with it looks like rdm. so im gonna say that jake is in the right. the video just shows that he did what he was supposed to do. i would have done the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Queen Ellie said:

- support. without proof that he took your ammo then you have no proof that its not rdm. logs show that you killed him. there are no pick up logs. so given the info he has to deal with it looks like rdm. so im gonna say that jake is in the right. the video just shows that he did what he was supposed to do. i would have done the same thing.

You shouldn't be making assumptions on a he said she said sit. Both parties weren't asked what happened. He either jumped the gun or was biased. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Yumi said:

-/+ Support

we don’t have logs for picking up ammo but if you shot him in the face for stealing the ammo we need proof or it’s rdm

Yummy is very correct and Elli

37 minutes ago, Queen Ellie said:

- support. without proof that he took your ammo then you have no proof that its not rdm. logs show that you killed him. there are no pick up logs. so given the info he has to deal with it looks like rdm. so im gonna say that jake is in the right. the video just shows that he did what he was supposed to do. i would have done the same thing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...