Jump to content

jacofsk Report


Haze_of_dream

Recommended Posts

+\- Support

I cant 100% confirm that that was for no reason as you have no provided any past footage, for all I know you should have damaged him and cut it to the part of him shooting you.

If you could provide footage that goes back a fair amount that would increase your chance of this report being accepted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-support, you have proof buy not of what your reporting him for. I didn't see him disconnect or advert missclick all I saw was that he killed you. You could have damaged him before or done something to where he shot you after. 

-there's no proof he rdmed you and no proof he lbs so -support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, gradyhasautism said:

-support, you have proof buy not of what your reporting him for. I didn't see him disconnect or advert missclick all I saw was that he killed you. You could have damaged him before or done something to where he shot you after.

You didn't even read the actual report, Moron.

17 hours ago, Haze_of_dream said:

(although not in the clip)

Furthermore, Your "support" doesn't mean anything, It doesn't make a valid report invalid or vice versa, Management decide based on what is supposed

 

And to top it all off, You shouldn't even be commenting unless you are directly involved or contributing evidence, Neither of which I see.

9 hours ago, Worlld said:

-/+ SUPPORT

Yes, it was rdm but at the same time, they are gonna accept the report and jail the guy for 5 minutes. That seems like a complete waste of time and effort. 

 

Normally I would agree with you, which is why i don't bother with these, but i have a HUGE issue with someone who tries to downplay an rdm as an 'accident' then immediately disconnect so i can't get him. Rules are rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Haze_of_dream said:

You didn't even read the actual report, Moron.

Furthermore, Your "support" doesn't mean anything, It doesn't make a valid report invalid or vice versa, Management decide based on what is supposed

 

And to top it all off, You shouldn't even be commenting unless you are directly involved or contributing evidence, Neither of which I see.

 

Normally I would agree with you, which is why i don't bother with these, but i have a HUGE issue with someone who tries to downplay an rdm as an 'accident' then immediately disconnect so i can't get him. Rules are rules.

This doesn't help you, you arguing on here just makes it seem more like your being a minge, which proves my point that your proof means nothing, its a video of him shooting you, not him shooting you out of no where. It starts with you being shot and killed. Which means you could have damaged him or done whatever for him to kill you in an rp situation. Further more don't argue on a report if your report is standing on you not being a minge (ie: you could have damaged him to be a cuck and he killed you in defence then "left" if he did. Which you still don't have proof of you dummy) 

-in all all points are valid and you have no proof other than he killed you, not even the begging of it

Edit: how in any way do you think that "you shouldn't be commenting unless you at contributing or involved" is a valid thing to say, that makes 0 sense. this is a forum for a reason and were here to judge whether their guilty or not, or a helping judgment to the person who Denies or accepts this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Yumi locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...