Haze_of_dream Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 Your in-game name: Haze_of_dream Staff members name: Immortality Staff member SteamID(http://steamidfinder.com/): Explain what happened: Neonix accused me of FDA although he called Pd raid after and called it inside the building (stairs) Immortality asked if I haad proof, Neither of us did, He jailed me for 'you sounded like you did not care' which isn't proof that's biased, When i told him that He gave the must unprofessional responde of 'report me' Evidence (screenshots, video, chat log, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neonix Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 the screenshots dont show anything and plus you did FDA as right after 2 seconds of calling it and you SAW me type, you ran inside pressing the keybind. You didn't have proof of me rule breaking and at this moment is kind of tired of you being in sits with you. I think he should have atleast check manager but the fact that you keep getting mad at him because you got hotheaded. Also, he told you to stop editing your E2 and you didn't listen, which shows you're ignorant. Honestly grow UP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haze_of_dream Posted January 16, 2018 Author Share Posted January 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Neonix said: the screenshots dont show anything and plus you did FDA as right after 2 seconds of calling it and you SAW me type, you ran inside pressing the keybind. You didn't have proof of me rule breaking and at this moment is kind of tired of you being in sits with you. I think he should have atleast check manager but the fact that you keep getting mad at him because you got hotheaded. Also, he told you to stop editing your E2 and you didn't listen, which shows you're ignorant. Honestly grow UP. It shows disrespect and the reasoning of jail which isn't valid. 2 minutes ago, Neonix said: You didn't have proof of me rule breaking Neither did you, Sit remains neutral but Immortality obviously doesn't care. 2 minutes ago, Neonix said: which shows you're ignorant. Honestly grow UP. Oh that's rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haze_of_dream Posted January 16, 2018 Author Share Posted January 16, 2018 Just now, ImVeryGay said: The amount of grammatical errors is sad. Shitposting, Derailing the thread and this is a report, Not a english essay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortality Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 I did not jail you for the reason "You acted like you didn't even care" (Was a simple statement, you were in the E2 menu for the whole sit). You were jailed for FDA. I told you to report me after you said "Now You're Lying", because you were complaining about being punished after i had made my decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haze_of_dream Posted January 16, 2018 Author Share Posted January 16, 2018 Just now, Immortality said: You were jailed for FDA Where's the proof? Neither side had any. So why did you jail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicxify Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 OOF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortality Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 5 minutes ago, Haze_of_dream said: Where's the proof? Neither side had any. So why did you jail? You ran into the PD, While being raided, using your key binds to get in. Are you saying, that all SITS are biased, and we should ignore all of them. We cannot get proof for every SIT. You are not exempt from the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haze_of_dream Posted January 16, 2018 Author Share Posted January 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, Immortality said: You ran into the PD, While being raided Where's the proof? You litterally just restated what the sit did except neither side any hard evidence, at that point the sit is neutral. You cannot automatically jail the accused. 4 minutes ago, Immortality said: Are you saying, that all SITS are biased Where the living fuck did you get this assumption from? 4 minutes ago, Immortality said: and we should ignore all of them Your dodging the question in an attempt to make a feeble point. 4 minutes ago, Immortality said: We cannot get proof for every SIT So you just contradicted in your own sentence, If theirs no proof to backup either side, It remains neutral, That isn't ignoring it, That's being unbiased, Huge difference. 5 minutes ago, Immortality said: ou are not exempt from the rules. Never once said that, and how does this relate to the thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortality Posted January 16, 2018 Share Posted January 16, 2018 What proof did you want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can't Stop The Rooster Posted January 17, 2018 Share Posted January 17, 2018 SIT, Staff in Training. I have talked to Immortality and told him what he was doing wrong. We all learn and move on. Thank you for your report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.cb5217e6604619d293ba6976a2b7ae94.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.