Staff Abuse Regarding Base Building

[TheChocoTaco]

Your in-game name:

 Smith Reynolds

Staff members name:

 thomas townsend, Lucifer Morningstar, Copton Chill

Staff member SteamID(http://steamidfinder.com/):

tt(STEAM_0:0142229065), LM(STEAM_0:1:93694976), CC(STEAM_0:0:15537821)

Explain what happened:

 During a raid on my base, thomas townsend came to my base and told me my fading door was not allowed as it was a "stacked fading door". While I disagreed with thomas I complied and deleted my door to create a side-by-side design to avoid the "stacked fading door" dilemma. While creating this door I did not use the stacker tool nor did I physically stack the props (as I did with my first door). After just finishing my door, another raid on my house occurs and again thomas townsend appears. thomas townsend says my door is not compliant with the rules as the fading doors are stacked (which it isn't in either sense of the word. I did not use the stack tool nor physically stack the props. I have included links to screenshots of my new door which is compliant with the rules). According to all of the admins listed, my door was still arbitrarily against the rules. The other two admins which I have listed sided with thomas townsend in a later sit. I insist upon admin punishment and full compensation along with rewarding VIP status as a result of unwarranted disruption of roleplay through admin abuse.

Evidence (screenshots, video, chat log, etc. This is required!)

These are images of the second door I created to be compliant with the rules (no stacked fading doors)

 https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/958595408449929613/A7E384271D754DE4DC42A377A548B1F368A0F897/

fading door closed^^^^

https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/958595408449929939/C7987822E07FA4DCE1F5B4B0F456876335B36015/

fading door opened^^^^

[Kirov]

idk if ur brain doesn't work fully but, those are still stacked.

If you can't get through with one lockpick its stacked. So no matter what they were still stacked this "disruption" i dont know about but those stacked fadings are stacked lmfao

-support

[Kirov]

@Colt Miller @Voided Outmove this to mbrp pls

[TheChocoTaco]

Nowhere does it refer to horizontal orientation as "Stacked"

[Kirov]

1 minute ago, TheChocoTaco said:

Nowhere does it refer to horizontal orientation as "Stacked"

jesus christ does ur brain work its still stacked fadings if u cant get through in one hit then its stacked

[TheChocoTaco]

Kirov,

 

Thank you for the passionate post, really. I appreciate the criticism and will seek avenues to improve. In regard to your statement "if u cant get through in one hit then its stacked", I see this as nothing more than a mindless platitude and encourage you to review the rules. Thanks again.

[Kirov]

1 minute ago, TheChocoTaco said:

Kirov,

 

Thank you for the passionate post, really. I appreciate the criticism and will seek avenues to improve. In regard to your statement "if u cant get through in one hit then its stacked", I see this as nothing more than a mindless platitude and encourage you to review the rules. Thanks again.

heres my mind right now, I give no fucks and im tired as shit. I put 100/10 passion into that post and if you dont agree i will rape your sister, good day to you.

[Tim The Enchanter]

If some body lockpicks your fading door, and there is a fading door on the other side unopened/unlockpickable, it would fall under stacked. also where do you get the idea of vip out of a report? lol.

[TheChocoTaco]

Kirov,

 

Thanks again for another passionate reply. I appreciate the soul manifested in your parlance and I'm glad the community has someone as adamant about Mexican Border RP as you.

[Kirov]

Just now, TheChocoTaco said:

Kirov,

 

Thanks again for another passionate reply. I appreciate the soul manifested in your parlance and I'm glad the community has someone as adamant about Mexican Border RP as you.

honestly same

[Kirov]

i still cant tell if this dude is joking and this is a huge shitpost

[TheChocoTaco]

Tim the Enchanter,

 

11. You may not stack fading doors. Fading doors must have a minimum hold length of five seconds.

It does not detail how a prop is "stacked" so you can only interpret it in the most basic sense of the word. As I stated, I used neither the stacker tool nor did I physically stack the props.

Thanks

[Colt Miller]

Moved.

[Tim The Enchanter]

from my experience, it could be considered stacking if they are that close together, like in your screenshots. one prop=one door. keeping them as close as you have them, a staff member could determine that they are stacked.  they way you have them set up currently, a player will lockpick the first door, and attempt to lockpick the others, and will find themselves unable to, as you can not lockpick other doors behind a fading door. while yes, they could move to the side and lockpick it, however, with a 5 second timer, theres no way to lockpick that fast into a base. 

so, what im seeing here is, your angry that a staff member determined your doors to be stacked, and now you are angry and want vip? lol.

[Lucifer Morningstar]

@Tim The Enchanter Don't take him seriously. This guy is minging and just trying to get a reaction out of the staff team. Copton and Obama will vouch for this once they get back on. 

He was told multiple times about the rule and proceeded to argue the whole time despite given a through explanation by the staff team. It's clear at this point that he is just minging and doing this just to get attention. His sarcasm in his responses is also a sign of this being one big joke to him.

[Kirov]

2 minutes ago, Lucifer Morningstar said:

@Tim The Enchanter Don't take him seriously. This guy is minging and just trying to get a reaction out of the staff team. Copton and Obama will vouch for this once they get back on. 

He was told multiple times about the rule and proceeded to argue the whole time despite given a through explanation by the staff team. It's clear at this point that he is just minging and doing this just to get attention. His sarcasm in his responses is also a sign of this being one big joke to him.

i took him veryyyyy serious

[Lucifer Morningstar]

Making false reports is punishable btw.

[TheChocoTaco]

Thanks for the reply Lucifer Morningstar,

 

You're correct in that I was told multiple times that I can't have "stacked" props in reference to rule 11. However, rule 11. delivers no insight into what "stacked" means. As I said above, my door was not made using the stacker tool, nor are the props physically stacked; therefor it is unreasonable to call it a stacked fading door. I would also like to note that you have an undoubtedly vested interest in the outcome of this situation as it directly impacts you.

[Lucifer Morningstar]

11 minutes ago, TheChocoTaco said:

Thanks for the reply Lucifer Morningstar,

 

You're correct in that I was told multiple times that I can't have "stacked" props in reference to rule 11. However, rule 11. delivers no insight into what "stacked" means. As I said above, my door was not made using the stacker tool, nor are the props physically stacked; therefor it is unreasonable to call it a stacked fading door. I would also like to note that you have an undoubtedly vested interest in the situation as it directly impacts you.

 

 

3. Respect staff members decisions. If a rule is not specified, staff may decide what is and isn't allowed to an extent.

Rule three grants me permission to specify/add to a rule if it is vague or otherwise is incomprehensible to players. I gave you a clear explanation to the rule and told you the extent to which it can be used.  You clearly disobeyed staff members instructions by continuing to use these stacked doors anyway and making multiple false sits in which your sole intent was getting into an argument with staff about it. It got so bad to the point where we had to threaten to kick you from the game in order for you to stop. Point being you were given clear expectations of the rules and how to follow them and yet you insisted upon making a meme out of them and you have taken the joke too far up to this point. Making a false report on the forums is not going to end well for you.

 

[TheChocoTaco]

Thanks for the reply Lucifer Morningstar,

I need not assure you, my intentions are clear; I want nothing more than to get to the bottom of a situation of blatant admin abuse. In regard to rule three, this does not accurately apply to the situation and bears no weight to the discussion. As I said above, rule 11. states that "stacked" fading doors are not allowed, but by no sense of the phrase is my door "stacked".

Edit: I would like to add that my first fading door was indeed stacked, both through use of the stacker tool and in physical orientation. I deleted the door at the admin's request.

[Copton Chill]

big boi copton enters the ring

Just because you didn't use the stacker tool to stack your props doesn't bypass the rule. As previously said in-game and on forums by other staff, if you can't enter further after lockpicking one prop, it is considered stacking. It doesn't matter what means you used to get the end result. The end result was a stacked fading door.

Also @Tim The Enchanter, the screenshots he provided are bullshit and he made these props in a separate base after we told him to fix his multiple times. This is the ones that he actually has after @breaddedknight {CoW} (<--Thomas Townsend) had already warned him to remove the first time.

You are lying.

Aren't you going to mention how later you kept on making the same sits about a situation we clearly resolved and explained to you. And how you started putting the same crap in ooc and advert just to mess with us when we told you not to call the same sit ? And then you got muted ? 

I'm surprised you took trolling this far man.

 

[Copton Chill]

 

[Damplips]

@TheChocoTaco this staff report just completely back fired on ya.

@Rybrex can ya close it

[TheChocoTaco]

In reference to "If you can't enter further after lockpicking one prop, it is considered stacking" nowhere in the rules does it state this and I think this is a poor job at an attempt of self justification. Second, my reconstruction of my door is no attempt at trying to deceive. My reconstruction was simply so I could get screenshots of the door I created. 

I would also like to add that you wouldn't stack your plates or books sideways right? As I've said time and time again, my props are not physically stacked nor were they stacked using the stacker tool. 

[Sweatshop Boi]

51 minutes ago, Damplips said:

@TheChocoTaco this staff report just completely back fired on ya.

@Rybrex can ya close it

 

2 minutes ago, TheChocoTaco said:

In reference to "If you can't enter further after lockpicking one prop, it is considered stacking" nowhere in the rules does it state this and I think this is a poor job at an attempt of self justification. Second, my reconstruction of my door is no attempt at trying to deceive. My reconstruction was simply so I could get screenshots of the door I created. 

I would also like to add that you wouldn't stack your plates or books sideways right? As I've said time and time again, my props are not physically stacked nor were they stacked using the stacker tool. 

As damplips has said this has completely backfired on you and you can get into trouble yourself. You are also not making it easier for yourself by saying that because as far as I can say the staff’s word is final in that situation so you can either listen or be punished if you do not listen to them.